.svg){kind=icon}
Mailing address: 399 Boylston Street, Suite 650
Boston, MA 02116
866-568-0590
support@clearpointstrategy.com
We analyzed over 20,000 strategic plans. Get a copy of the full report.
Over 20,000 strategic plans analyzed
Owned initiatives complete at 2.5× the rate. Five questions tell you what AI would find in your plan.
Get my score2 minutes · no email
Ask AI about your plan
“Which measures have no owner?”
“Which owners never reported?”
“Which projects actually finished?”
Answer, across 200+ organizations
ClearPoint platform data, January 2026 snapshot.
The gap is not model access. It is what the record already says.
Five questions. One score. Your priority named.
Start the assessment2 minutes · no email
The assessment
Your sector sets your benchmark.
Five questions follow. Each one names what the platform record says about it.
Question 1 of 5 · Data foundation
Question 2 of 5 · Framework maturity
Question 3 of 5 · Accountability
Question 4 of 5 · Reporting
Question 5 of 5 · Integration
Where the score is held down
Named, with what the platform record says about each.
An AI summary of this record repeats a number nobody can source.
In ClearPoint
Every measure carries a source, an owner and a last-refresh date on the record itself.
Measures that move no objective still get reported. Nobody can say which ones matter.
In ClearPoint
Measures link to objectives. Anything unlinked shows up in a list you can work through.
Names in the owner column, silence in the record. A board hears that as progress.
In ClearPoint
Owners get a due date and a field to write in. Missed updates are counted, not guessed.
A project passes its end date and the report says nothing. The slip surfaces a quarter late.
In ClearPoint
Overdue projects surface with their owner, their reason, and the measure they hold up.
Reporting time goes to retyping. The month closes before anyone reads the numbers.
In ClearPoint
Numbers arrive by integration or import, so the reporting month goes to the discussion.
Four pages, ready to forward
Four pages on your plan: the score, your sector's real record, and a 90-day plan.
Your five answers, and the two dimensions holding the score down.
What the record actually looks like in your sector, with sample sizes.
Three moves, dated, each with a role that signs it off.
One email. The report opens in your browser and lands in your inbox.
We do not sell your address. One click unsubscribes you.
I'll skip the reportOwners, sources and written updates live on the record, so the gaps are counted, not estimated.
Plans already kept this way
Your five answers, each rated 1 to 5, multiplied by four. A 20 to 100 range.
0–39
No named owners. AI would summarize a record nobody maintains.
40–59
Names exist, updates don't. Ownership on paper, silence in the record.
60–79
Measures hold. Projects still pass their end dates unexplained.
80–100
Owned, current, read. Point AI at the record, not the warehouse.
Thirty minutes, starting on your lowest dimension.
Talk to a Strategy ExpertYour KPI data is ready for AI when every measure carries a named owner, a source, and a recent written status. Across over 20,000 strategic plans from 200+ organizations, ClearPoint platform data shows initiatives with a named owner complete at 2.5× the rate (21.5% vs. 8.7%), and ClearPoint shows which metrics still need an owner. An AI layer reading a record with no owners inherits the gap, then reports it faster.
An AI readiness assessment for local government scores whether a city's performance record - objectives, measures, projects and owners - can support automated analysis. Most versions grade infrastructure. In local government, ClearPoint shows which owned metrics still need a written status update from their named owner, the record an AI pilot reads first.
Public sector AI readiness depends less on model access than on whether the strategic record is maintained by named people. ClearPoint shows which performance status records say No Information, No Data or Data Error instead of reporting a result.
AI governance readiness asks who is accountable for a number before a model uses it. AI readiness usually asks whether the data is reachable. The distinction decides outcomes: initiatives with a named owner complete at 2.5× the rate (21.5% vs. 8.7%), and ClearPoint shows which named owners haven't written one yet. Governance without a written record is a column of names.
The score is the sum of your five answers, each rated 1 to 5, multiplied by four, giving a 20 to 100 range. Four phases follow: Foundation (0-39), Building (40-59), Acceleration (60-79), Optimization (80-100). Answers are self-reported and are never compared against your own ClearPoint account.
The benchmarks come from ClearPoint platform data: over 20,000 strategic plans from 200+ organizations. Element-level figures use a January 2026 snapshot, and the update-to-login ratio covers 2025. Project completion is recorded completion - a team can finish work without checking the box - so those figures are a floor, not a measure of failure.
Method
Every benchmark comes from ClearPoint platform data. The corpus figure — over 20,000 strategic plans from 200+ organizations — counts every plan built on the platform, active and archived. The element-level figures on ownership, status records, project completion and project duration come from a January 2026 snapshot of organizations live at that date. The update-to-login ratio covers calendar year 2025 and excludes ClearPoint staff accounts.
One deliberate limit, stated rather than hidden. Project completion is reported as recorded completion: a team can close work without setting the flag, so the figure is a floor, not a measure of failure. Where a claim could not be reproduced from the data, it does not appear on this page.
Your answers are self-reported and are never compared against your own ClearPoint account.
Don't want to schedule a demo yet? No worries. Just enter your contact info below to get instant access to an interactive tour of ClearPoint.
.webp){kind=small}