The Status Rule Playbook: 2026 Government Benchmark

Across 199 government and public-sector organizations tracking 194,601 performance measures, ClearPoint shows which measures have a status rule — the threshold that turns them green, amber, or red — and which still need one. The playbook shows the counterintuitive fix: the top quartile on status-rule coverage tracks a median of 87 measures; the bottom quartile tracks 754. The prune is the control system.

Every number in this playbook is measured from de-identified production data — the actual configuration of 199 government strategic plans as of August 13, 2026. No surveys, and none of the unsourced "67% of strategies fail" folklore.

What's inside

The 87-vs-754 finding. The strongest predictor of status-rule coverage isn't tooling or headcount — it's how few measures the organization tries to track. Top-quartile governments run a median 87-measure portfolio with 75% coverage; bottom-quartile governments run 754 measures with 5.3% coverage.

Find your percentile. The coverage distribution across 199 organizations — bottom quartile ≤13%, median 43.3%, top quartile ≥65% — segmented for counties (46.4%), utilities and special districts (39.9%), and cities (32.2%).

The tooling trap. Bottom-quartile organizations use reminder emails at twice the top quartile's rate. A reminder checks that someone updated; a status rule checks what the number says.

Two separate diseases. The correlation between status-rule coverage and owner activity is r = 0.01 — fixing thresholds does not fix ownership. The playbook sequences both.

The 90-day program. Prune → threshold → own → run one cycle, sized for a five-department rollout with one performance lead.

The threshold worksheet. Six steps from baseline to the rationale sentence that survives a council question — because a threshold copied from another city is a threshold you can't defend.